Destructoid has an article up over here proclaiming the reasons why Sonic 4 will suck – essentially it’s a piss-take on the nitpicky little things that some have been complaining about Sonic 4 that will make zero difference to the game in general, everything from eye-colour to Robotnik/Eggman’s naming argument. Go and take a look, but remember to take it with a large helping of salt. =P
21 Comments
Hahahahah that whole article is hilarious! Soniquetta FTW!!
Lies. Some people have tested the demo and they are saying this is what Sonic fans have been waiting for.
This is actually the opposite of humor. Misleading tags there.
i find it quit funny, the whole hes to fast argument coming right after the hes to slow one was greatly amusing.
What is this I don’t even.
Immature please this crap again i find that very ungrateful, that he is hating because of the sonic in recent years. So all this maybe a little true but that doesn’t effect the overall game. pssft please this man is obviously imature.
It’s funny to a degree, but Jim Sterling has this problem with people criticizing anything regarding Sonic the Hedgehog 4. I wouldn’t be surprised if he actually believes retro fans are actually like what he’s satirizing. This makes sense considering that he seems to be very fond of the Sonic Advanced games while most classic fans think the Advanced series were “okay” at best.
While I understand he left out most of the legitimate complaints about Sonic 4 out because, well, they’re legitimate and thus hard to turn into satire, I’d like to see a podcast with a Sonic 4 debate between him and someone like Slingerland or something. I know who I’ll root for. KOBE!
guys, its just a joke
The argument about why he wasn’t in 16 bit 2d graphics is biased. New super mario bros was in 3d graphics on a 2d playing field and nobody complained about that right? I know its a just joke poking fun at sonic 4 but I don’t think it’s a legitimate topic to argue about, seriously, graphics could matter less, i mean come on, have any of you played games on systems such as the Atari 2600? its less than 8 bit and most of the games are excellent given the systems limited capabilities. so my point is graphics shouldn’t matter regardless of what series it is.
(gosh that’s a long rant)
It’s a pretty accurate laundry list of complaints I’ve seen in the Sonic 4 topic here. I found it quite funny.
ugh,I saw that image on /v/.
XD That was entertaining
Wow! that guy is angry!
Awesome, I don’t agree with what he is saying by saying the opposite, but it’s still awesome!
I wish you could play as Soniquetta in Sonic 4 🙁
By the way, guys, don’t rage over a SARCASTIC article. It was really funny to read, also.
Why. I only ask. Why? Could they not go back and play the 4 old genesis games till their eyes bleed to have it realized…”Dude..we want..THAT!..not that..” really Sega…plz?
this was funny as all hell!!!!
My brother-in-law made that article. No joke, my sister is married to him.
You do realize, he is just ridiculing Sonic 4 just to make the fanboys/fangirls mad, right?
He just wants to hate just because its not an HD remake of Sonic 1…. Sega doesn’t have to re-release the same game over and over again if they don’t want to, thats why they’ve been striving to provide performance in other ways… The only Reason Sonic 4 will suck is because of the FANS and the PLAYERS that have no freaking clue how to play Sonic 4.
Why is everyone fighting? Is there some inside joke I’m missing? Didn’t anyone read the article? It’s obviously parody. I mean, come on! He listed Sonic as both too slow and too fast!